Faces are difficult.
I teach teenagers the art of public speaking. Most of them
can, with prodding, master the fundamental mechanics of putting a speech
together—assembling an argument, enhancing its credibility and clarity with
supporting material, designing a “hook” at the beginning, and so on. Delivery
of the speech is another matter. They’re perfect little chatterboxes in social
situations, but when placed at the front of the room, with all eyes on them—no more
eyes than they’d encounter at the lunch table, really—they often clam up and dissolve
into squirming jelly.
It’s the faces, of course. The way a person narrows their
eyes, a tiny flare of the nostrils, a tightening of the skin around the
cheekbones—every little shift and twist conveys new information, and we’re
trained from birth to recognize and react to it. And for someone who’s at a
vulnerable age, terrified of the judgment of their peers, to have to deal with
all of the difficult mechanics of giving a speech—and then to look up and see
dozens of faces, each one projecting data with the intensity of a high-pressure
fire hose—it’s often too much to bear.
No wonder they retreat behind their scripts! Much safer to smoothly read meticulously-crafted sentences off a notecard than to live in that terrifying moment of seeing and being seen!
I was a pretty decent public speaker even in adolescence,
and developed rapidly once I made it an area of specialization. I’ve
come to believe that may have something to do with my apparent position on the
autism spectrum. I have always had a great deal of difficulty with faces—recognizing
them, correlating them with names, understanding when they send me cues that I’m
being offensive. I now think that this was my superpower as a developing public
speaker. I never feared to look people in the face because I was largely blind
to the sentiments those faces were expressing. I could just focus on getting my
message across.
And yet, I came to realize as time went by that the ultimate
goal of any really good public speaker was to achieve a sense of genuine
connection with the audience, and to move past the process of “performing” into
one of sharing genuine meaning. At its top level, public speaking isn’t about
projecting information, it’s about exchanging
information. The speaker initiates the conversation, yes, but is also receiving
continual nonverbal feedback from the audience. Unspoken questions are asked. The best speakers use their eyes to listen for those questions, and seek to and answer them. Audiences broadcast emotions, and the speaker seeks to surf those emotions
and to guide them. The audience’s faces are both a map of the terrain the
speaker is traversing and a scoreboard assessing the speaker’s performance. And
the “boss mission” of public speaking is to learn to love those faces—to look
people in the eye not because you have
to, but because you want to, because
that is what makes the experience of speaking enjoyable.
Which brings me to the COVID-19 pandemic, and one of the
weirdest situations I’ve faced (ahem) as a teacher.
Like thousands of other schools throughout the world, mine
is moving classes online. Teachers are learning to master the use of new
remote-learning technologies that allow us to teach kids who aren’t physically
proximate to ourselves. There are some disciplines, particularly
lecture-intensive ones, where this will probably work pretty well. Others,
maybe not so much. God knows how phys ed is gonna operate.
Speech education, though, is going to a uniquely weird place.
As I write this, I’m sitting in front of the desktop computer
monitor from which I will be teaching next week. The setup isn’t meaningfully
different from your cell phone, I suppose; my web camera is positioned directly
atop the monitor. So, when I teach, I’m going to be looking at the faces of my
students on the screen, and they’ll be looking at mine, and those of their
peers. But here’s the rub: in order to
maintain the appearance of eye contact, these quaran-teens will need to be looking not at the faces on the screen, but at the
camera lens above them.
A paradox: the moment the speaker dares to look the listener in the eye, the listener sees the speaker look away. After spending the first nine weeks of the semester training students to look at, and to enjoy looking at, the faces of their audience, I will now have to train them to specifically avoid that habit.
A paradox: the moment the speaker dares to look the listener in the eye, the listener sees the speaker look away. After spending the first nine weeks of the semester training students to look at, and to enjoy looking at, the faces of their audience, I will now have to train them to specifically avoid that habit.
And I find myself wondering about the long-term consequences
of this kind of social distance. I wonder what sort of speakers we will become if we
learn that communication is the art of dodging the listener's face. I stare at the future through a glassy lens, and I worry. For all my lack of social aptitude, I have thrived in the proximity of my audience, in the realization that they are, like me, beasts of temperate flesh. I fear a world in which they devolve from that form into shapes on a screen, blobs of color in a black expanse.
No comments:
Post a Comment